Nowadays social media giveaway hosted there is store which has come under fire after users noticed a contestant’s likes suddenly skyrocketed from 300 to over 1,000 just before the contest ended. When one of our editor raised concerns and demanded disqualification, the organizers started ignoring all the dms and ignoring cheating stuff. Is the winner was fixed from starting???
The giveaway, which ran for 15 days, was supposed to reward the comment with the most likes. For the first 13 days, engagement seemed fair, with most participants gaining likes gradually. However, on the 14th day, one participant’s likes jumped drastically, leading many to suspect bot activity or paid engagement. The proof of that is below as privacy concern we have hided the names of the contestants.
Public Outrage and Accusations of Unfair Play
As soon as users and our editor noticed the suspicious spike, they took to the comments section, demanding that the participant be disqualified. Many argued that the contest was being manipulated, making it impossible for genuine participants to win.
However, instead of addressing the concerns, the giveaway organizers aren’t responding. This behaviour only fueled more backlash, with users accusing the store of encouraging fraudulent behavior rather than ensuring fairness.
Calls for Transparency and Stricter Giveaway Rules
The incident has reignited conversations about the fairness of social media contests. Many believe that giveaways relying on likes or engagement are vulnerable to manipulation. Users are now urging brands to adopt random winner selection, manual verification, or stricter fraud detection measures to prevent such controversies.
At the time of writing, has not issued an official apology or clarification. However, the controversy has damaged trust among followers, raising questions about the legitimacy of online giveaways.
With social media giveaways becoming a common marketing strategy, transparency and fairness remain crucial to maintaining audience trust. Whether platforms will take action to prevent such incidents in the future remains to be seen.